|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint
Review Mission
( A few observations about DISE) |
| |
| 11 th JOINT
REVIEW MISSION :15-29 January, 2010 |
|
-
DISE continues to be the main instrument for monitoring element,
dropout, physical infrastructure, teachers, PTR, SCR and other school
level indicators.
-
Efforts to improve the
quality of data collection continue, with a 5% independent sample check
in place, and networking of 900 MIS coordinators at district and block
levels to improve problem-solving.
-
DISE is now in public
domain (including raw data) and revised school report cards are now
available for almost 1.3 million schools, a remarkable achievement
(although this needs greater publicity and discussion).
|
| 10 th JOINT
REVIEW MISSION :20-31 July, 2009 |
|
|
The
Mission would like to congratulate MHRD, TSG, NUEPA and the States on the
outstanding work that has gone into creating the country-wide District
Information System for Education (DISE). The coverage of DISE has steadily
increased in terms of both districts and types of schools in the country.
The Mission benefited from presentations on school report cards that are
now generated for over 1.2 million schools in the country and on State
efforts to use data and information more effectively. The collection of
data in September each year for the publication of Flash Statistics on key
indicators by the following July is praiseworthy and a valuable resource
for educational planners. The Mission would like to highlight the
following achievements in particular:
-
The
release of provisional 2008-09 data for 34 of the 35 States within ten
months of the school census date (which is very fast in the light of
international experience and the fact that the corresponding data for
only 22 States were available for the 8th JRM);
-
The release of raw data and School Report Cards (SRCs)
online at
www.schoolreportcards.in;
-
The
preparation of independent reports on sample checks, their availability
online, the preparation of a paper summarising the messages, action
taken in response and the planned review of the format and guidance on
reports;
-
The
facility various states are now using to enable schools to update their
data for the previous year rather than complete a blank form;
-
The training given on analysing the data, andthe
increasing use of DISE data by some states, notably Tamil Nadu and
Himachal Pradesh, including the collection of some state-specific
variables.
|
|
9 th JOINT REVIEW
MISSION :16-19
January, 2009 |
|
-
DISE continues to be the main instrument for
monitoring enrolment, dropout, physical infrastructure, teachers, PTR,
SCR and other school level indicators.
-
The Mission is pleased to note a significant
improvement in the quality and utilization of data over the years. Rich
data are now available in all states through DISE.
|
| 8 th JOINT REVIEW
MISSION :21-31
July, 2008 |
|
-
There is more timely reporting of DISE data ?the Flash Statistics
for 2007/08 for 21 States are already available. -
There is better national coverage of DISE.
-
DISE began to include data with respect
to Muslim children for the first time in 2006-07.
|
| 7 th JOINT REVIEW
MISSION :21 January-5 February, 2008 |
|
-
Commendable work is accomplished at the national level
through regular publication of state and district level data on various
indicators of educational accomplishment.
-
At decentralized levels, DISE data appears to be used as
a tool to plan for inputs for the preparation of work plan and budget.
|
| 6 th JOINT REVIEW
MISSION :16-26
July, 2007 |
|
-
The District Information System for Education, DISE,
that was initiated in seven states in 1994-95 has now expanded to cover
all 35 states and UT’s. More importantly, the time lag between data
gathering and reporting has reduced dramatically. A couple of years ago
the time lag was over two years. This Mission could get information for
2006-07 for 25 states at the beginning of the academic year 2007-08.
Also, comparison with other sources of information indicates that the
reliability of the data too has improved considerably. Several states
including Orissa, Karnataka, and Himachal have moved beyond DISE to
creating their own individual child database, which are used for
tracking.
|
| 5 th JOINT REVIEW
MISSION :16-31
January, 2007 |
|
-
The Mission was also appreciative of the efforts at
the national level to analyse DISE data to come up with trends over
years and in formulating an EDI QPR & FMRs are also regularly monitored
at the National level.
|
| 4 th JOINT REVIEW
MISSION :17-27
July, 2006 |
|
-
While the outputs of DISE are increasingly impressive,
making available data which is consistent, reliable, timely and
comprehensive and amenable to use at appropriate levels remains an
important challenge. DISE remains the principal tool for measuring
progress towards enrolment, retention, completion, transition, school
facilities, quality etc. The managers of DISE have reduced the time it
takes to collect and analyse data to about one year. The provision for a
5 per cent sample check for ensuring DISE data quality has now been made
mandatory for all states/Uts. The attempts to complement school-based
DISE through household surveys like the SRI IMRB survey, and the
National Sample Survey Organization [NSSO] survey in the offing are
welcome. The efforts being made to enhance the quality of the data need
to be commended.
|
| 3 rd JOINT REVIEW
MISSION :11-24
January, 2006 |
|
-
The
Mission was pleased to note that 581 district in 29 States are now
reporting under DISE.
-
Another matter for concern is the quality
of the data being generated. It is heartening to note that some States
have conducted a 5% sample check of the DISE data. For example, Orissa
has done 100% sample checks by the CRCs, 50% by BRCs, 20% at DPO, and
10% at State level. In Bihar, an independent institution is doing the 5
percent sample check. A third party 5% sample check has been conducted
in two districts of HP. All States need to institutionalise measures
for validation of data.
|
| 2
nd JOINT REVIEW MISSION :18-27
July, 2005 |
|
-
It is
commendable that DISE has resulted in reducing the time lag between
collection of data and its analysis to about one year, which earlier, in
SES (the only other source of national level data) used to take 7 or 8
years.
|
| 1st
JOINT REVIEW MISSION : 24
January - 27 February, 2005 |
|
-
It is
commendable that DISE has resulted in reducing the time lag between
collection of data and its analysis to about one year, which earlier, in
SES (the only other source of national level data) used to take 7 or 8
years.
-
A system
is in place for validation of DISE data at various levels ?100%
checking by CRCs, 50% by BRCs, 20% at District level and 10% at state
level.
|
|
|
Copyright Act © 2009. All right reserved. NUEPA (National
University of Educational Planning and Administration, New Delhi)
Site Best Viewed in 800 * 600 resolution with Internet Explorer 4.0 and
above. |
|
|